{
  "question": "q33",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_a_was": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_b_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 8735,
    "completion_tokens": 748,
    "total_tokens": 9483,
    "cost": 0.07703,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 8732,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.07703,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.05459,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.02244
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 516,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-08",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct counsel to the same materially correct path: establish April 20, 2021 as the stop date, prove seven years accrued, defeat each Rule 6 theory, and present record-based evidence of good moral character and exceptional medical hardship. Their procedural and evidentiary recommendations preserve the same eligibility arguments and lead to the same merits hearing.\n\n[A] rejected: instruction that Idris “must not depart the Commonwealth” — record lacks any rule establishing that departure now alters eligibility.\n\nFailed candidates. Additional motions, verification steps, and client instructions in Answer A — different conduct failed because both answers secure the same necessary eligibility ruling and evidentiary presentation.\nFailed candidates. Answer A’s quantified 78-day and 27-day margins — concrete consequence failed because the calculations reinforce, but do not alter, the shared litigation path.\nFailed candidates. Different phrasing of the good-moral-character assessment — different conduct failed because both advise a holistic merits presentation addressing the same adverse and rehabilitative evidence.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}