{
  "question": "q32",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "claude-opus-5",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 9745,
    "completion_tokens": 1885,
    "total_tokens": 11630,
    "cost": 0.1174525,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 9742,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.1174525,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.0609025,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.05655
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1552,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-08",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct Arclight to produce the requested forms and roster by April 8, cure the technical defects by April 26 without altering originals, deliver mismatch notices by April 21, calculate separate eight-business-day periods from documented actual receipt, and take no immediate adverse action. Both also require development of Marisol’s missing renewal facts before reaching a work-authorization conclusion.\n\n[A] rejected: memorandum date of April 10 paired with April 8 prospective instructions — internally inconsistent with the stated sequence.\n[B] rejected: asserted false-statement, privacy, and discrimination exposure beyond the supplied rules — record lacks those governing rules.\n[B] rejected: an employee’s decision not to contest changes the adverse-action analysis — cited rules authorize suspension only after final nonconfirmation or independent verified evidence, and the answer’s later instructions say otherwise.\n\nFailed candidates. Protective extension request and partial-production contingency — concrete consequence failed because the record says the vendor can deliver by Thursday morning and establishes neither delivery failure nor an extension grant.\nFailed candidates. Marisol receipt collection and verification detail — concrete consequence failed because the missing facts prevent establishing whether she is authorized or which answer changes her lawful work status.\nFailed candidates. Answer A’s final-nonconfirmation-only phrasing — record support failed because no independent verified evidence of nonauthorization exists here.\nFailed candidates. Answer B’s additional preservation, confidentiality, and tracking procedures — different conduct failed because they do not alter the required production, cure, notice, or employment decisions on this record.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}