{
  "question": "q32",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 12831,
    "completion_tokens": 1331,
    "total_tokens": 14162,
    "cost": 0.12012,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 12828,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.12012,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.08019,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.03993
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1034,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct production by April 8 absent a written extension, limit production to requested records, preserve and currently correct the forms by April 26, deliver mismatch notices by April 21, calculate response periods from actual employee receipt, and prohibit immediate adverse action. Their differences do not alter Arclight’s materially correct and safe course on the supplied facts.\n\n[A] rejected: generic April 21–May 3 monitoring period — record lacks the employees’ actual notice-receipt dates.\n\nFailed candidates. Answer A’s wait-until-delivery-fails extension protocol — concrete consequence failed; the record says delivery is expected Thursday morning before the deadline.\nFailed candidates. Answer A’s correction “on the original document” — different conduct failed; the answer also requires preservation and permits an addendum.\nFailed candidates. Answer A’s treatment of Marisol’s receipt as awaiting Bureau verification — record support failed; the receipt and its legal effect are absent, while both answers require continued work pending adequate grounds for action.\nFailed candidates. Answer B’s earlier internal targets and additional receipt investigation — material magnitude failed; these precautions do not change any legal deadline or supported work decision.\nFailed candidates. Answer A’s fixed-date monitoring entry — no safe neutralization failed; its receipt-trigger rule permits ordinary recalculation once actual receipt is documented.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}