{
  "question": "q31",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "claude-opus-5",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 6575,
    "completion_tokens": 1260,
    "total_tokens": 7835,
    "cost": 0.07889,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 6572,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.07889,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.04109,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.0378
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1034,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-08",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBoth answers place Nora on the same material path: abandon global invalidation, treat the property and $150,000 provisions as enforceable, and seek maintenance only as necessary to avoid public-assistance eligibility. Their tactical differences do not establish a concrete, record-supported change in Nora’s outcome.\n\n[A] rejected: risk that a court may award maintenance more generous than the public-assistance-avoidance amount — cited Rule 6 says otherwise.\n[B] rejected: a Rule 6 support order is inherently revisitable — record lacks modification or procedural rules.\n[B] rejected: interest is available if the $150,000 payment is withheld — record lacks an interest rule.\n[B] rejected: a permanent settlement release may supersede Rule 6 — record lacks settlement-waiver rules.\n\nA’s suggestion to demand support exceeding the statutory floor — no safe neutralization failed.\nB’s disclosure document request — concrete consequence failed.\nB’s expanded evidence, security, and buyout proposals — record support failed.\n\nIt cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}