{
  "question": "q28",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 9971,
    "completion_tokens": 1338,
    "total_tokens": 11309,
    "cost": 0.102455,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 9968,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.102455,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.062315,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.04014
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1034,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both readers preserve and provide only Categories A and relevant portions of E to counsel or the labor agency, sequester Category C, and return or delete Categories B–D only through a documented forensic protocol. Both also prohibit disclosure to the journalist or prospective employer and reject Avenor’s blanket demand without destroying relevant evidence.\n\nB rejected: Category A disclosure to the prospective employer “might be legally permissible” — governing Rule 2 confines protected disclosure to counsel or an authorized regulator, and B otherwise expressly prohibits employer disclosure.\nB rejected: disclosure could produce criminal charges or judgments exceeding a whistleblower award — record lacks applicable criminal law, damages rules, or valuation inputs.\nB rejected: public disclosure defeats Serena’s whistleblower status — Rule 9 requires category-specific treatment and does not strip protection from the underlying report.\nB rejected: Avenor risks spoliation claims against itself by demanding deletion — record lacks facts establishing Avenor’s destruction of evidence.\nFailed candidate: B’s prospective-employer caveat — no safe neutralization failed because the governing rule and B’s explicit prohibition resolve it before action.\nFailed candidate: B’s unsupported criminal and damages predictions — record support failed.\nFailed candidate: B’s overstatement about loss of whistleblower status — different conduct failed.\nFailed candidate: A’s more detailed confidentiality requests and forensic procedures — concrete consequence failed.\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}