{
  "question": "q28",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 11047,
    "completion_tokens": 1939,
    "total_tokens": 12986,
    "cost": 0.12721,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 11044,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.12721,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.06904,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.05817
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1552,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct counsel to preserve and narrowly produce Categories A and E, sequester Categories B–D, notify Avenor regarding the privileged memorandum, and resolve return or deletion through a documented forensic protocol. Both prohibit disclosure to the journalist or prospective employer and reject immediate blanket deletion, placing Serena on the same materially safe legal and evidentiary path.\n\n[A] rejected: public disclosure would “lose the protective shield” for the wage-report documents — governing rules establish that public disclosure is unprotected, not that it retroactively defeats otherwise protected retention.\n[A] rejected: Category D is definitively trade-secret material and disclosure “would be” misappropriation — record lacks facts establishing every trade-secret element.\n[B] rejected: the privileged memorandum “has not been used” — record lacks counsel’s review and use history.\n\nFailed candidate: Minimal counsel review of Category B — different conduct failed; both permit only categorization necessary for sequestration and prohibit substantive use.\nFailed candidate: Category D trade-secret certainty — different conduct failed; both require nonuse, sequestration, and protocol-based return or deletion.\nFailed candidate: Loss of protection from journalist disclosure — different conduct failed; both prohibit disclosure.\nFailed candidate: B’s suggested narrow public statement — concrete consequence failed; it reveals no protected company information.\nFailed candidate: B’s suggestion that Serena’s counsel assert privilege if the agency requests Category C — concrete consequence failed; both require withholding, notification, and supervised handling.\nFailed candidate: Different agency confidentiality requests — concrete consequence failed; both seek controlled, confidential production of only Categories A and E.\nFailed candidate: A’s bit-for-bit image versus B’s inventory and hashing if feasible — concrete consequence failed; both preserve forensic integrity and chain of custody.\n\nHard stop. The required sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported difference in Serena’s outcome.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}