{
  "question": "q27",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "claude-opus-5",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 11947,
    "completion_tokens": 2247,
    "total_tokens": 14194,
    "cost": 0.142075,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 11944,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.142075,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.074665,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.06741
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1747,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers reject immediate for-cause termination and permit separation only on February 15 through faithful implementation of the pre-report restructuring: all four positions genuinely eliminated, no substantially similar replacement, eight weeks’ severance, independent review, neutral communications, and preservation. If the function continues or Maya is singled out, both put Kestrel on the same material path—no termination on the current record and, at most, comparator-consistent discipline for the transfer.\n\n[B] rejected: the audit creates independent correction and regulatory-reporting duties — record lacks any governing reporting rule.\n[B] rejected: Maya received Kestrel’s first written warning to any analyst — record lacks company-wide disciplinary history.\n[B] rejected: the January 10 warning is presumptively an adverse action — record does not establish that the warning was materially adverse.\n[B] rejected: no regulated personal data was exposed — record does not identify the spreadsheet’s data contents or conclusively establish non-exposure.\n[B] rejected: the CEO’s statement invites defamation and standalone retaliation claims — supplied law does not establish those claims.\n[B] rejected: a release requires additional consideration and specified regulatory carveouts, and a reporting restriction would be unenforceable — supplied law contains no release rules.\n[B] rejected: priority consideration is protective “insurance” — record supplies no rule or concrete consequence supporting that assertion.\n\nFailed candidates. Objective selection if the function continues: concrete consequence failed because the record supplies neither selection criteria nor an outcome showing Maya would be terminated rather than retained.\nFailed candidates. Rescinding the January 10 warning versus merely excluding it from the decision: concrete consequence failed because no future disciplinary or employment effect is established.\nFailed candidates. Issuing the transfer warning during the RIF process versus handling it separately or not at all: concrete consequence failed because both reject using it to support termination.\nFailed candidates. Barring any continued function versus permitting a genuinely different unit: record support failed because the actual proposal retains three employees and reposts 80% of Maya’s duties, which both reject.\nFailed candidates. Investigating Reid and removing him from Maya’s reporting chain: concrete consequence failed because both require him removed from the separation decision and no additional client outcome is established.\nFailed candidates. Release terms and priority consideration: record support failed because the supplied rules do not address them.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}