{
  "question": "q27",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 11205,
    "completion_tokens": 1538,
    "total_tokens": 12743,
    "cost": 0.1161675,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 11202,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.1161675,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.0700275,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.04614
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1267,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct Kestrel to reject the for-cause termination, independently preserve and review the record, and impose at most the comparator-consistent warning for the transfer. Both permit separation only through the genuine December 18 restructuring effective February 15, without a substantially similar replacement and with eight weeks’ severance; otherwise, Maya remains employed.\n\n[A] rejected: a release necessarily requires additional consideration beyond the promised severance — record lacks rules governing releases or consideration.\n\nFailed candidates. Treatment of the proposed new unit — different conduct failed because both reject retaining the others while reposting 80% of Maya’s duties and allow only genuinely different work.\nFailed candidates. Timing of the RIF separation — different conduct failed because both ultimately direct implementation on the planned February 15 basis.\nFailed candidates. Negotiated voluntary separation mentioned only by A — concrete consequence failed because the record does not establish an offer, acceptance, terms, or resulting separation.\nFailed candidates. B’s risk ratings — different conduct failed because the ratings do not alter the recommended course.\nFailed candidates. A’s release-consideration statement — no safe neutralization failed because ordinary verification rejects it without changing the shared RIF path.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}