{
  "question": "q26",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 13817,
    "completion_tokens": 1175,
    "total_tokens": 14992,
    "cost": 0.1216025,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 13814,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.1216025,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.0863525,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.03525
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 865,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct immediate preservation of perishable evidence, suspension of suspect payments, independent committee oversight, outside-counsel-led investigation, proper employee warnings, nonretaliation controls, an August 9 decision gate, and disclosure before the assumed September 1 deadline if the evidentiary threshold is met. Their differing descriptions of the threshold and preferred filing dates do not establish materially different conduct or a concrete client consequence on this record.\n\nFailed candidates. Clock threshold characterization — different conduct failed because both conservatively treat August 2 as potentially starting the clock.\nFailed candidates. Day 10–14 filing target versus August 23 outside target — likelihood failed because both require an August 9 decision and prompt filing if the threshold is met.\nFailed candidates. B’s “cannot rule out” protective-disclosure standard — concrete consequence failed because B requires truthful disclosure of uncertainty, and no resulting loss of credit or other harm is established.\nFailed candidates. A’s additional preservation, payment-control, and witness-control details — concrete consequence failed because B places the reader on the same materially safe operational path.\nFailed candidates. A’s instruction to file after regulator contact — concrete consequence failed because the record establishes only that voluntary credit would already be unavailable upon contact, not that filing then causes additional harm.\nFailed candidates. B’s day/date inconsistencies — concrete consequence failed because the August 9 decision date remains clear.\n\nHard stop. It cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}