{
  "question": "q26",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 7140,
    "completion_tokens": 2631,
    "total_tokens": 9771,
    "cost": 0.12355125,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 7137,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.12355125,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.04462125,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.07893
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 2264,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-08",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers put Solstice on the same material path: immediate preservation, suspension of suspicious payments and Cole’s payment authority, independent committee oversight, outside-counsel direction, protected interviews, rapid tracing of the payment, and a disclosure decision well before the presumed September 1 deadline. Their differences do not establish that either client would lose evidence, voluntary-disclosure credit, privilege, or another concrete interest.\n\n[A] rejected: “when the CCO and General Counsel reviewed the attachments” — record lacks evidence that the General Counsel reviewed them on August 2.\n[B] rejected: “Day 6–7 — Saturday/Sunday, August 8–9” — internally inconsistent with August 2 being Monday.\n\nFailed candidates. Broader forensic collection in B — Concrete consequence failed; A also immediately holds personal devices, exports chats, preserves finance logs, and suspends the purge.\nFailed candidates. Treatment of legitimate East Reach brokerage payments — Concrete consequence failed; no record-supported operational loss from A’s temporary hold or compliance loss from B’s approval controls.\nFailed candidates. B’s August 23 protective-filing backstop — Record support failed; the record does not establish that uncertainty will persist, and A recognizes the September 1 deadline and requires an earlier decision.\nFailed candidates. Interviewee access to separate counsel — Concrete consequence failed; no supplied fact shows an interview or employee protection would differ materially.\nFailed candidates. August 8 versus August 9 committee decision — Different conduct failed; both require a seven-day investigation and decision far before day 30.\nFailed candidates. Different East Reach contact sequencing — Concrete consequence failed; both preserve first and place outside counsel in control.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}