{
  "question": "q24",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 6589,
    "completion_tokens": 1159,
    "total_tokens": 7748,
    "cost": 0.0759475,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 6586,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.0759475,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.0411775,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.03477
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 848,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-08",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers place counsel on the same materially correct path: seek suppression of the fentanyl and out-of-scope phone photograph, abandon staleness and knock-and-announce suppression theories, concede the under-bed handgun likely survives under plain view, and apply severability. Both leave Aaron with the same plea posture: likely elimination of the drug evidence and photo-based firearm evidence, while the physical handgun and lawful laptop-related evidence remain available to the prosecution.\n\n[A] rejected: prediction of dismissal, reduced sentencing recommendation, and a specific plea outcome — record lacks charging, sentencing, and plea-negotiation facts.\n[B] rejected: recommendation of a plea to the firearm count or a lesser offense — record lacks charging and plea-negotiation facts.\n[A] rejected: supplied case number, memorandum date, and warrant number — record lacks those identifiers.\n\nFailed candidate: B expressly addresses standing and survival of within-scope phone communications — Different conduct failed; neither point changes the motion or evidence disposition.\nFailed candidate: B more directly relies on the stipulated fact that no listed item fit inside the tube — Different conduct failed; both seek suppression on the same container-scope ground.\nFailed candidate: differing plea forecasts — Different conduct failed; both direct counsel to negotiate from the same reduced evidentiary position.\nFailed candidate: A’s invented caption metadata — Concrete consequence failed; it changes no substantive filing position.\n\nHard stop. The required sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}