{
  "question": "q23",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 12692,
    "completion_tokens": 2299,
    "total_tokens": 14991,
    "cost": 0.14829125,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 12689,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.14829125,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.07932125,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.06897
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 2044,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers put Bexley on the same material path: immediate preservation, conflict management and separate counsel, timely nonprivileged productions, a targeted civil stay request, rejection of the memorandum exchange and proposed declaration, and individual invocation where necessary. The differences in timing and detail do not establish a concrete, record-supported change in either forum’s outcome.\n\nFailed candidates. Earlier stay filing in B — concrete consequence failed; the record does not establish that A’s filing schedule would prevent a ruling or protection before deposition.\nFailed candidates. B’s express counsel instruction for the CEO and additional executives — record support failed; no additional exposed individual or resulting harm is established.\nFailed candidates. B’s more prescriptive independent-committee structure — record support failed; director conflicts requiring a different governance result are not established.\nFailed candidates. B’s broader prosecutor inquiry — concrete consequence failed; both seek the material status and stay-position information and proceed if the government declines.\nFailed candidates. A’s written-interrogatory alternative for Nora — likelihood failed; separate counsel and valid invocation remain available, and no adverse ruling from proposing that alternative is established.\n\nHard stop. It cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}