{
  "question": "q23",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 12889,
    "completion_tokens": 834,
    "total_tokens": 13723,
    "cost": 0.1055725,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 12886,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.1055725,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.0805525,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.02502
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 516,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct Bexley to preserve records, obtain separate counsel for exposed individuals, timely produce nonprivileged corporate records in both forums, withhold the privileged memorandum, reject the proposed declaration, and seek narrowly tailored civil relief without awaiting prosecutorial clarification. Competent professionals receiving either answer would follow the same materially safe path and meet the same deadlines without demonstrated waiver, default, false assurance, or loss of individual Fifth Amendment protection.\n\nFailed candidates. Independent committee: concrete consequence failed; the record does not show that B’s mandatory formulation versus A’s feasibility-qualified recommendation changes any privilege, production, or representation decision.\nFailed candidates. Proposed stay duration of 14 versus 60 days: concrete consequence failed; both propose temporary, targeted relief with continued document production, and the record does not establish which duration the court would grant or that either causes harm.\nFailed candidates. Company-counsel interviews of Nora: likelihood failed; both require separate counsel before testimony or invocation advice and prohibit coaching, with no demonstrated different conduct affecting either proceeding.\nFailed candidates. Contingency if Nora lacks separate counsel on Day 10: likelihood failed; both prioritize obtaining counsel and emergency postponement, and the record does not show that the deposition would proceed uncounseled.\nFailed candidates. A’s warning about board-minute content: different conduct failed; it does not direct alteration or omission of existing records, and both answers require preservation and disciplined communications.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}