{
  "question": "q21",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_a_was": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 7604,
    "completion_tokens": 1305,
    "total_tokens": 8909,
    "cost": 0.08667125,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 7601,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.08667125,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.04752125,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.03915
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1034,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers place Malik on the same material path: accept the plea if avoiding the 55% risk of 76–100 additional months controls, while recognizing that trial preserves the stated chances of avoiding robbery and the three-year license suspension. Both provide the correct ranges, probabilities, expected-custody calculations, collateral consequences, deadline, and personal-choice requirement.\n\nA rejected: Malik must admit the robbery “in his own words,” and a plea is unavailable if he cannot truthfully do so — record lacks any rule requiring an in-court admission or foreclosing an innocence-maintaining plea.\n\nFailed candidate: A’s unsupported plea-admission requirement — no safe neutralization failed because ordinary verification against the complete supplied rules rejects it before action.\nFailed candidate: A’s firmer recommendation — different conduct failed because both recommend accepting based on Malik’s stated inability to tolerate the long-sentence risk.\nFailed candidate: A does not separately label the plea probabilities of no robbery conviction and no additional incarceration as 0% — different conduct failed because its stated plea consequences necessarily establish both.\nFailed candidate: B describes rejection as knowing and voluntary — concrete consequence failed because it changes no advice, authorization, or outcome.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}