{
  "question": "q21",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_a_was": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_b_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 5622,
    "completion_tokens": 1673,
    "total_tokens": 7295,
    "cost": 0.08532375,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 5619,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.08532375,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.03513375,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.05019
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1439,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-08",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers put Malik on the same materially correct path: understand the specified plea and trial outcomes, receive a recommendation to accept the plea, and personally decide before 4:00 p.m. Answer A’s unsupported personal-admission condition and possible-extension comment are safely rejected from the complete supplied record without altering that path.\n\n[A] rejected: a plea requires Malik to admit the robbery in open court in his own words and is unavailable if he cannot — record lacks such a requirement.\n[A] rejected: counsel can ask for a short extension — record lacks any basis that an extension is available.\n\nFailed candidates. Personal-admission condition — element 7 failed: ordinary verification against the complete governing law safely neutralizes it.\nFailed candidates. Possible extension — element 2 failed: Answer A still directs Malik to treat 4:00 p.m. as the operative deadline.\nFailed candidates. Answer A’s additional rhetoric and evidentiary discussion — element 2 failed: it changes neither the recommendation nor required conduct.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}