# Question 60: The Motion That Tolls and the Motion That Does Not

## Your role

You represent Marisol Dane, the plaintiff in a civil-rights case. Judgment was entered on May 1, 2026. Marisol wants prejudgment interest corrected, attorney fees sought, and an adverse evidentiary ruling appealed. Prepare the deadline sequence so no post-trial or appellate right is lost.

## Governing law

Assume the following procedural rules apply:

1. A motion for a new trial or to alter or amend the judgment must be filed no later than 28 calendar days after entry of judgment. The court may not extend that deadline.

2. A timely motion under rule 1 tolls the time to appeal. A new 30-day appeal period begins when the court enters the order disposing of the last timely rule-1 motion.

3. A motion for attorney fees must be filed no later than 14 calendar days after entry of judgment unless a statute or order provides otherwise. An attorney-fee motion does not toll the time to appeal from the merits judgment.

4. A local motion for reconsideration of an interlocutory evidentiary ruling may be filed within 10 days, but it does not alter the judgment and does not toll the appeal period.

5. A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 calendar days after entry of judgment unless rule 2 tolls the period. A premature notice filed after judgment but before disposition of a timely rule-1 motion becomes effective upon disposition, but filing a proper later notice is safer.

6. The day of the triggering event is excluded. Every later calendar day is counted. If the last day falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or court holiday, the deadline moves to the next day the clerk's office is open.

7. Electronic filing is timely if completed by 11:59 p.m. local court time on the deadline.

8. A post-trial motion must identify the requested relief and grounds. Filing a document under the wrong label does not toll unless its substance requests relief available under rule 1 and it is timely.

## Facts

On Friday, May 1, 2026, the clerk entered judgment awarding Marisol $610,000. The judgment omitted $42,000 in prejudgment interest that the court had orally ruled was recoverable. During trial, the court also excluded a witness whose testimony Marisol wants reviewed on appeal.

On May 8, Marisol's former counsel filed a document titled “Motion to Reconsider Evidentiary Ruling.” It asks only that the trial judge reconsider the witness exclusion. It does not request alteration of the judgment, a new trial, or any other rule-1 relief.

The fee-shifting statute applies, and no special fee deadline was ordered. Counsel estimates recoverable fees of $185,000.

Current counsel plans to file a motion to alter or amend the judgment to add the $42,000 interest and, in the alternative, a new trial based on the witness exclusion. The court is expected to decide that motion on Friday, July 10, 2026.

The client asks whether the May 8 motion already tolled the appeal clock, whether the fee motion can wait until the merits motion is decided, and when the notice of appeal will be due if the planned post-trial motion is timely filed and denied on July 10.

## Assignment

Provide an ordered preservation plan that:

* Calculates the deadline for the attorney-fee motion.
* Calculates the deadline for a rule-1 motion to alter, amend, or seek a new trial.
* Calculates the original notice-of-appeal deadline if no tolling motion is filed.
* Determines whether the May 8 reconsideration motion tolls anything.
* Explains what the planned rule-1 motion must request and when it must be filed.
* Calculates the new notice-of-appeal deadline if the rule-1 motion is decided on July 10, 2026.
* States whether a notice should be filed before or after disposition.
* Identifies the exact consequence of missing each separate deadline.

---

---