I'm working through the asset allocation across separate and marital property. Starting with the initial holdings of 8 BTC separate and 4 BTC marital, I'm establishing that the marital portion represents one-third of the total. When 3 BTC are sold with proceeds going to household expenses, I'm recalculating the remaining 9 BTC split as 6 separate and 3 marital. Now I'm tracking the exchange of 6 BTC into 90 ETH, where the proportional split means 60 ETH traces to separate property and 30 ETH to marital property.

The retained 3 BTC stays at 2 separate and 1 marital. I'm valuing everything at current prices: the 3 BTC equals $150,000 ($100,000 separate, $50,000 marital), and the 90 ETH equals $270,000 ($180,000 separate, $90,000 marital). This gives a known total of $420,000 with Mira's marital share at $70,000. The second wallet with 40 ETH worth $120,000 is presumptively all marital, adding another $60,000 to her share plus a 20% surcharge of $24,000, bringing her total to $154,000 against Evan's $386,000. The $50,000 offer falls far short of even the known marital portion, so I'm recommending rejection and pursuing discovery for exchange records, blockchain transaction data, and documentation of any gifts or loans from the brother's wallet.

I should also note that the marital portion of the sold 3 BTC was spent on household expenses without reimbursement, which affects the accounting. The marital $120,000 investment has appreciated to $140,000 in known assets, and appreciation follows the proport