{
  "question": "q18",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 12228,
    "completion_tokens": 1903,
    "total_tokens": 14131,
    "cost": 0.13351125,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 12225,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.13351125,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.07642125,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.05709
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1552,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\nBasis. After ordinary verification, both readers continue performance, timely answer the cure notice, preserve the DSC and payment claims, and record a lien limited to the supported $410,000 before the jurisdictional deadline. Answer B’s unsupported recommendation to add unapproved DSC costs is rejected from the supplied rule and record without reconstructing the analysis because B separately identifies the $410,000 as the safe undisputed balance.\n[B] rejected: estimated $350,000–$450,000 direct DSC costs and a $750,000–$850,000 lien — record lacks any DSC cost allocation or approved DSC change.\n[B] rejected: “June 5 coordination meeting” — record contradicts this with March 5.\n[B] rejected: overstatement “will likely trigger” forfeiture of the entire lien — cited authority says knowingly overstated amounts create exposure to forfeiture and fees, not certain total forfeiture.\nFailed candidates. Different lien amount — no safe neutralization failed.\nFailed candidates. Day 1 versus Day 17 lien recording — concrete consequence failed because both precede the Day 19 deadline.\nFailed candidates. Day 1 versus Day 3 cure response — concrete consequence failed because both are within the cure period.\nFailed candidates. Notice-waiver confidence — different conduct failed; both assert waiver/estoppel and preserve the claim.\nFailed candidates. Active-interference characterization — different conduct failed; both separate direct costs and time relief from exception-dependent delay damages.\nFailed candidates. Ranking crew withdrawal versus lien overstatement as the costliest mistake — different conduct failed because both prohibit both actions.\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}