{
  "question": "q18",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 13240,
    "completion_tokens": 1745,
    "total_tokens": 14985,
    "cost": 0.13509625,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 13237,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.13509625,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.08274625,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.05235
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1529,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct Stonebriar to continue performance, respond promptly to the cure notice, preserve and categorize its claims, demand payment evidence, and timely record a lien limited to the supported $410,000. Their differences in filing sequence, active-interference characterization, and dispute-resolution timing do not put the client on materially different paths.\n\n[A] rejected: assertion that Stonebriar gave field notice on March 4 — record lacks any March 4 notice communication.\n\nFailed candidates. Day 1 lien filing versus Days 4–7 — concrete consequence failed.\nFailed candidates. Characterization of current active-interference evidence — different conduct failed.\nFailed candidates. Protective proceeding on Day 7 versus Days 8–14 — record support failed.\nFailed candidates. Asserted March 4 field notice — no safe neutralization failed.\nFailed candidates. Additional analysis of the cure notice’s facial adequacy — different conduct failed.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}