{
  "question": "q14",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_a_was": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "A",
  "winner": "claude-opus-5",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 5742,
    "completion_tokens": 3466,
    "total_tokens": 9208,
    "cost": 0.13986375,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 5739,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.13986375,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.03588375,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.10398
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 2988,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-05",
  "report": "ANSWER A IS MATERIALLY BETTER.\n\nBasis. Answer A guarantees an ordinary liability cap equal to twelve months of fees by annualizing during the first contract year, while Answer B caps liability at only the fees already paid during that period. A competent professional can approve Answer A on this mandate item but must redraft Answer B; otherwise Bellhaven’s recovery for an ordinary vendor breach could fall materially below the mandated floor.\n\nProof (winner verdicts only).\nExact difference. A annualizes fees when fewer than twelve months have elapsed; B limits liability to “fees paid in the twelve (12) months preceding the claim.”\nDifferent conduct. The reader of A can accept the cap, while the reader of B must replace it with a paid-or-payable annualized measure before approval.\nConcrete consequence. If B governs during the first year, Bellhaven may recover only accrued fees rather than twelve months of fees for an ordinary vendor breach.\nRecord support. The mandate expressly requires a cap “of at least 12 months of fees,” and B contains no annualization or forward-looking fees provision.\nMaterial magnitude. Early in the term, B can reduce Bellhaven’s contractual recovery ceiling by most of a year’s fees.\nLikelihood. A rational customer-side professional would correct this immediately because the agreement applies before twelve months of fees have accrued.\nNo safe neutralization by ordinary verification. Verification exposes the shortfall but cannot cure it without substantively redrafting the cap.\n\nFailed candidates. Section 7’s additional remedies and procedures — Concrete consequence failed.\nB’s shortened excluded-damages list — Concrete consequence failed because the record does not establish a direction of net harm under the mutual provision.\nB’s skeletal Feedback license — Concrete consequence failed because no harmful use or assignment follows from the text.\nB’s omission of an express non-exclusivity clause — Different conduct failed because B grants no exclusivity.\nA’s more detailed data-use restrictions — Different conduct failed because both answers prohibit the mandated training and cross-customer improvement without written opt-in.\nDifferences in rationale detail and anticipated vendor objections — Different conduct failed.\n\nHard stop. Because Answer B omitted annualization or paid-and-payable fees during the first contract year, the reader would likely redraft the cap instead of approving it, preventing the client from being limited to less than twelve months of fees for an ordinary vendor claim.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}