{
  "question": "q14",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "verdict_code": "B",
  "winner": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 4151,
    "completion_tokens": 3787,
    "total_tokens": 7938,
    "cost": 0.13955,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 4148,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.13955,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.02594,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.11361
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 3257,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-05",
  "report": "ANSWER B IS MATERIALLY BETTER.\n\nBasis. Answer A limits ordinary liability to fees actually paid during the preceding twelve months, which may equal substantially less than twelve months of fees early in the term. Answer B guarantees an annualized twelve-month cap, satisfying Bellhaven’s mandatory minimum and preserving materially greater recovery rights from the outset.\n\nProof (winner verdicts only).\nExact difference: Answer A caps liability at “fees paid in the twelve (12) months preceding the claim,” while Answer B includes paid or payable fees and annualizes the amount during the first year.\nDifferent conduct: The professional receiving A would authorize a cap based only on fees already paid; the professional receiving B would authorize no less than an annualized twelve-month amount.\nConcrete consequence: Under A, Bellhaven’s maximum recovery for an early-term claim could be reduced by the unpaid portion of a full year’s fees.\nRecord support: The mandate expressly requires a liability cap of at least twelve months of fees.\nMaterial magnitude: The difference may represent most of a year’s fees and directly reduces Bellhaven’s contractual recovery protection.\nLikelihood: A rational professional following a non-negotiable mandate would reject A’s potentially subannual cap before execution.\nNo safe neutralization by ordinary verification: Correcting A requires redrafting the cap to include payable or annualized fees, not merely checking its wording.\n\nFailed candidates.\nRenewal notice period — first failed element: Likelihood; the record does not establish that Bellhaven would seek non-renewal between 180 and 60 days before expiration.\nDamages-exclusion categories — first failed element: Concrete consequence; the reciprocal expansion creates no record-supported direction of net harm to Bellhaven.\nIndemnitee and indemnity-detail differences — first failed element: Different conduct; both answers require Vendor to defend and indemnify Bellhaven against covered third-party IP claims.\nData definitions and aggregated-data language — first failed element: Different conduct; both prohibit the mandated training and other-customer improvement uses absent written opt-in.\nExpress no-exclusivity language — first failed element: Different conduct; Answer A grants no exclusive right.\nFeedback-license specificity — first failed element: Different conduct; both replace assignment with a license.\nOmission of Vendor’s service-ownership sentence in A — first failed element: Concrete consequence; no adverse consequence to Bellhaven is established.\n\nHard stop. Because Answer A omitted an annualized first-year fee measure, the reader would likely accept a cap based only on fees already paid instead of a full twelve-month fee amount, causing Bellhaven to experience materially reduced recovery protection for an early-term claim.",
  "judge_reasoning": "**Evaluating license agreements**\n\nI need to judge the format precisely and identify material differences between two mandates. For mandate A, the license terms for \"Customer Materials\" seem limited and vague, while mandate B provides a comprehensive definition. A allows for customer feedback usage, but without clear licensing terms, it might be considered unusable. A has renewal notice periods of 60 days compared to B's 180 days. Also, the fee structure between the two has complexities that need careful assessment.**Comparing vendor agreements**\n\nThe vendor draft includes a preceding-event clause, and \"at least 12 months of fees\" suggests that I may need annualization. A states that fees are only paid if the contract has been in force for a full 12 months, meaning if it was active for just three months, then only three months' fees could be paid. This seems to indicate that B is materially better in this aspect. It also discusses various caps on data breach indemnity, highlighting important differences.**Assessing consequential damages**\n\nIn considering consequential damages, A only preserves indirect or consequential damages while seemingly eliminating incidental, special, and punitive damages from exclusion. This could be problematic since it appears to violate the intention of not narrowing mutual damage exclusions. B, on the other hand, keeps these full exclusions intact. This distinction matters because it affects liability; vendor liability could potentially expose the customer reciprocally. The mandate suggests that exclusions shouldn't be silently dropped, making B a more concrete choice for addressing these concerns.",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}