{
  "question": "q13",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "A",
  "winner": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 4586,
    "completion_tokens": 3596,
    "total_tokens": 8182,
    "cost": 0.13653875,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 4583,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.13653875,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.02865875,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.10788
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 3106,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "ANSWER A IS MATERIALLY BETTER.\n\nBasis. Answer A requires DevOps to disable deletion and garbage collection and create centralized snapshots of Git and Jira within 48 hours. Answer B leaves these mutable, relevant engineering systems to general custodian instructions, without the technical preservation necessary to secure a point-in-time evidentiary record.\n\nProof (winner verdicts only).\nExact difference. Answer B omits any technical suspension or collection for Jira and self-hosted Git; Answer A requires deletion/garbage-collection suspension, repository snapshots, and Jira exports.\nDifferent conduct. Under A, DevOps preserves controlled copies within 48 hours; under B, no owner performs that preservation.\nConcrete consequence. Under A, Trellick retains a fixed record of source code, commits, branches, tickets, comments, and attachments; under B, later changes or routine repository operations can eliminate or alter that evidence.\nRecord support. The facts identify Jira and self-hosted Git as the systems tracking VX-9 engineering work, and the rules prohibit relying on interested custodians to select what survives.\nMaterial magnitude. Loss of the development and issue history would impair Trellick’s ability to establish what firmware existed, what defects were reported, and what testing or remediation occurred.\nLikelihood. These are active engineering systems whose contents are routinely changed, making centralized preservation a present action rather than a hypothetical precaution.\nNo safe neutralization by ordinary verification. Correcting Answer B requires designing and assigning the omitted repository-preservation process, not merely checking its instructions.\n\nFailed candidates. Personal-app 48-hour collection deadline — concrete consequence failed because Answer B separately directs immediate preservation and suspension of retention policies.\nFailed candidates. Omitted CRM technical action — likelihood failed because the record identifies no CRM deletion schedule.\nFailed candidates. Unsupported October 24, 2023 date — concrete consequence failed because its preservation range is overinclusive rather than shown to omit relevant material.\nFailed candidates. Missing attached acknowledgment form — concrete consequence failed because the notice still expressly requires acknowledgment.\nFailed candidates. Marcus Bell designated most time-critical — different conduct failed because both answers prioritize stopping the Friday reimage.\n\nHard stop. Because Answer B omitted centralized technical preservation of Jira and Git, the reader would likely leave those systems operating under general custodian instructions instead of disabling destructive operations and creating controlled snapshots, causing Trellick to lack a secured point-in-time record of material VX-9 engineering evidence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "**Evaluating contractor obligations**\n\nI'm considering whether a contractor can issue a hold to direct recipients based on preservation demands. A hold notice typically covers a three-year range prior to the demand. It looks like VX-9 has been developed over the last three years. I think a memo might be under 400 words, likely around 344, and a hold should be under 600. There's a question if the winner can show a single divergence, especially regarding technical preservation concerning Git/Jira deletions.",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}