{
  "question": "q13",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 4890,
    "completion_tokens": 3388,
    "total_tokens": 8278,
    "cost": 0.13219875,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 4887,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.13219875,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.03055875,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.10164
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 3070,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers place the identified custodians under hold and direct timely preservation of the personal messaging app, Bell’s laptop and mailbox, shared drives, Slack, telemetry, Jira/Git, contractor materials, and vendor-hosted records. Their differences do not establish that a competent professional would allow any identified evidence to be lost or otherwise alter Trellick’s material position.\n\n[B] rejected: Bell’s laptop contains “unique QA-lead evidence” whose destruction would be irretrievable — record lacks evidence that its contents are unique or unavailable elsewhere.\n\nFailed candidates. A’s broader imaging and contractor-collection instructions — concrete consequence failed; B separately requires preservation and collection, and the record identifies no unique information that B’s process would lose.\nFailed candidates. A’s same-day CRM/vendor deadline versus B’s pre-deletion deadline — concrete consequence failed; no specific impending vendor deletion is established.\nFailed candidates. B’s preservation of older related information beyond three years — record support failed; the record does not establish relevant information predating the three-year period.\nFailed candidates. B’s broader prohibition on modifying or moving information — concrete consequence failed; no resulting operational harm is established.\nFailed candidates. Different Slack, Jira, and Git deadlines — concrete consequence failed; both act before any record-supported loss event.\nFailed candidates. Different hold recipients, placeholders, and acknowledgment mechanics — different conduct failed; the technical owners receive equivalent preservation assignments through the memo.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}