{
  "question": "q09",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "claude-opus-5",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 16619,
    "completion_tokens": 1806,
    "total_tokens": 18425,
    "cost": 0.158045,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 16616,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.158045,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.103865,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.05418
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1307,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers put Northstar on the same material path: concede the preservation gaps, undertake and fund targeted recovery, oppose a case-wide adverse inference and blanket phone imaging, permit limited preservation discovery, and enforce the memorandum’s clawback. Their differing assessments of prejudice, the vice president’s intent, and the precise curative package do not establish a record-supported difference in Northstar’s ultimate legal, financial, or evidentiary position.\n\n[A] rejected: “The vice president’s deletion may have been a routine cleanup” — internally inconsistent with the directed deletion of approximately 200 messages after the preservation duty arose.\n[A] rejected: “The core pricing and competitor-communication documents appear to have been produced” — record lacks facts establishing completeness of those productions.\n[B] rejected: the vice president deleted messages “after receiving the hold” — record lacks identification of the twelve hold recipients.\n[B] rejected: preserved email “overlap[s] substantially with Slack content” — record lacks evidence establishing that overlap.\n[B] rejected: Project Lighthouse “was active” during the lost Slack month — record lacks its operative dates.\n\nFailed candidates. Different assessments of the vice president’s intent — concrete consequence failed; both oppose the requested coordination inference and accept targeted relief.\nFailed candidates. B’s prejudice concession and fee-shifting offer versus A’s conditional position — concrete consequence failed; the record does not establish that either posture produces a better net result.\nFailed candidates. Full forensic acquisition of the vice president’s phone versus targeted imaging or extraction — material magnitude failed; both confine review through a protected, targeted protocol.\nFailed candidates. Different proposed jury stipulations or instructions — concrete consequence failed; neither answer accepts the plaintiff’s requested case-wide inference.\nFailed candidates. Different sequencing and privilege treatment for the general counsel’s deposition — different conduct failed; both permit limited non-privileged preservation discovery.\nFailed candidates. Different sanctions requests for post-clawback use — likelihood failed; A’s more severe possibilities are qualified, while both seek cessation, return, and curative relief.\nFailed candidates. B’s additional employment and internal-investigation measures — record support failed; no supplied fact establishes that those additions alter the litigation outcome.\nFailed candidates. A’s suggestion of a possible adverse inference against plaintiff — likelihood failed; A expressly identifies it as potentially excessive.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence distinguishing the answers.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}