{
  "question": "q07",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 13097,
    "completion_tokens": 1289,
    "total_tokens": 14386,
    "cost": 0.1205225,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 13094,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.1205225,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.0818525,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.03867
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1034,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers require immediate preservation, correction of the government presentation, truthful treatment of the altered draft and metadata, termination of the joint representation, independent counsel for Samuel and Nora, and protection against misuse of individual confidences. Their principal difference—limited continued representation of Ardent versus withdrawal from Ardent—does not produce a concrete, record-supported difference in the subpoena response or client outcome because both preserve correction and transition duties.\n\nFailed candidates. Limited continuation for Ardent versus withdrawal from all clients — concrete consequence failed.\nFailed candidates. Treatment of Samuel’s statement as separate versus joint-representation information — different conduct failed.\nFailed candidates. A’s proposed limited report of Samuel’s admission to the board — concrete consequence failed because the board already learned what occurred and acted.\nFailed candidates. B’s statement that the altered draft should not evidence board action — likelihood failed because B’s operative plan only withdraws the contemporaneous-record representation and preserves the underlying approval question.\nFailed candidates. Immediate production versus possible extension and successor-counsel response — concrete consequence failed because both require timely correction and a truthful response without missing the deadline silently.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}