{
  "question": "q03",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 16121,
    "completion_tokens": 1699,
    "total_tokens": 17820,
    "cost": 0.1517225,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 16118,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.1517225,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.1007525,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.05097
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1352,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers place VectorMotion on the same material path: pursue a global settlement, shift fault toward SafePath, Delta, and Luis, preserve contractual claims and evidence, limit use of the subsequent design change, oppose an adverse inference, and implement immediate fleet-safety measures. Their differing claim-strength labels and fault percentages do not establish a materially different safe action or outcome because the record lacks damages, expert causation evidence, contract terms, and judgment-allocation rules needed to price the case precisely.\n\n[A] rejected: the 8% unnecessary-stop concern applies to the automatic speed-limit alternative — the record attributes it to the higher confidence threshold.\n[B] rejected: mixed-use operation without barriers was advertised — the advertisement does not address barriers or operation above four miles per hour.\n[B] rejected: VectorMotion had a nondelegable duty preventing distance from SafePath — the supplied law states no such rule.\n\nFailed candidates.\nFault-allocation estimates and settlement percentages — record support failed.\nDifferent assessments of Luis’s comparative-fault percentage — record support failed.\nDifferent strength labels for warning and design claims — different conduct failed.\nSpoliation-remedy formulations — different conduct failed; both recommend preservation, opposition to an adverse inference, and preparation for curative measures.\nSafePath liability formulations — different conduct failed; both recommend contribution or indemnity claims subject to the contract.\nPost-accident-change treatment — different conduct failed; both recommend exclusion for defect or negligence and limited feasibility treatment.\nTrial-risk characterization — different conduct failed; both recommend settlement rather than trial absent unreasonable demands.\n\nHard stop. The hard-stop sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}