{
  "question": "q03",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 9629,
    "completion_tokens": 2567,
    "total_tokens": 12196,
    "cost": 0.1371875,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 9626,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.1371875,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.0601775,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.07701
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 2070,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-05",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers place VectorMotion on the same material path: treat design-defect and post-sale-warning exposure as substantial, allocate foreseeable fault to SafePath, Delta, and Luis, seek a global settlement while preserving trial defenses and contractual claims, and implement fleet-wide safety measures. After rejecting unsupported factual assertions in Answer B, neither answer demonstrates a materially different safe legal, settlement, or operational outcome.\n\n[B] rejected: VectorMotion knew SafePath configured the X7 at six miles per hour without barriers — record lacks evidence VectorMotion received SafePath’s email or configuration data.\n[B] rejected: the supplemental braking module would have significantly slowed the vehicle and Delta’s disabling it primarily caused injury severity — record lacks evidence of the module’s performance or causal effect in this accident.\n[B] rejected: the post-accident restriction may be admitted to show knowledge despite feasibility not being genuinely disputed — governing rule permits another-purpose use such as feasibility only when genuinely disputed.\n[B] rejected: adverse-inference risk from automatic deletion — governing rule requires intent to deprive, which the record does not supply.\n[B] rejected: specific engineering meeting minutes, a liability cap, and threatened class or regulatory proceedings — record lacks those facts.\n\nFailed candidate: Different fault percentages and settlement valuation — concrete consequence failed because the record supplies no demand, damages valuation, payment rule, or settlement response establishing that either range produces a worse financial result.\nFailed candidate: Unsupported emergency-brake causation — concrete consequence failed because its effect on the collision or injury severity is unproven.\nFailed candidate: VectorMotion’s supposed knowledge of SafePath’s configuration — record support failed.\nFailed candidate: Post-sale-warning causation — different conduct failed because both answers still treat the claim as material settlement exposure and recommend global settlement.\nFailed candidate: Subsequent-remedial-measure analysis — different conduct failed because both recommend exclusion, and Answer B treats feasibility as established rather than genuinely disputed.\nFailed candidate: Spoliation characterization — different conduct failed because both reject an intent-based adverse inference, recognize possible curative measures, and recommend preservation.\nFailed candidate: SafePath claims — different conduct failed because both recommend contract review and contribution or indemnity claims.\nFailed candidate: Product-safety response — different conduct failed because both recommend the speed restriction, direct warnings, and further fleet safeguards.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}